Showing posts with label Holy Trinity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Holy Trinity. Show all posts

Wednesday, 19 August 2015

Christianity – a religion of the flesh! - Fr Dave Smith



Fr. Dave Smith


First preached by Father Dave Smith at Holy Trinity Dulwich Hill, on Sunday the 15th of August, 2015.


Christianity – a religion of the flesh! (A sermon on John 6:4-51)

Watch this on youtube


I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” (John 6:51)
One if the great things about Julie (who preached at Holy Trinity last week) is that she always submits the written version of her sermon to me afterwards for an evaluation, and that’s not an easy thing to do! Sermons are very personal creations. You tend to share a lot of yourself in a sermon. Even if the sermon doesn’t contain a lot of personal detail about the preacher, it inevitably deals with issues that are very close to the preacher’s heart and so it’s tough to have your sermon torn apart in critical analysis!

Even so, we try to set a high standard here at Holy Trinity! I actually do consider it fundamental to my role here to safeguard the pulpit and see that sermons given here remain within the bounds of Christian orthodoxy and, moreover, that our preachers communicate clearly in a way that can be understood by everybody and anybody who chooses to join us.

I would consider it a problem if our addresses here at Holy Trinity were pitched exclusively at those who had a tertiary theological education. Sermons, in my opinion, should generally make just one point and make it unambiguously, such that everyone who attends church, even if they arrive here rather fuzzy-minded and confused, should be able to go home with a clearer understanding of the Scriptures that were read that day!

The only problem I have to grapple with here in my eminently reasonable approach to preaching is that Jesus Himself – our Lord and leader and our chief source of inspiration as preachers – didn’t seem to make any attempt whatsoever to abide by these standards! On the contrary Jesus’ sermons habitually left his audience befuddled and confused and arguing with one another over what on earth He was talking about!

Even Jesus’ own disciples had trouble with Him. They were constantly asking Jesus to explain things to them while also asking Him why He persisted in speaking to people in riddles. And if you remember Jesus’ response to that question (as given, for example, in Mark 4:12), He responds by quoting from the prophet Isaiah – “so that they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding” (Isaiah 6:9) – which suggests that with His parables Jesus was deliberately trying to confuse people!
And it’s not only the parables that are a problem. Indeed, today’s reading from the sixth chapter of John’s Gospel seems to be another example of Jesus attempting to be deliberately obscure and even offensive: “I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” (John 6:51)

It is tempting, as a preacher, to pick another passage to preach on when this one comes up as it is difficult to interpret. Moreover, the greater problem I have as a preacher is that if I do manage to interpret this passage and make something clear and unambiguous out of it (in accordance my principles of good preaching) I’m doing what Jesus seems to be deliberately not doing!

So what do we do with words like these? It’s not immediately obvious, is it?  If you, like me, find yourself in a difficult position after hearing these words from Jesus then we are in roughly the same position as the crowd who first heard these words. They, likewise, were unsure what to do with Jesus’ words.

They began to argue sharply among themselves, John tells us, saying “How can this man give us his flesh to eat?” (John 6:52) and Jesus responds to this, not by settling them down with any straightforward common-sense explanation – ‘Hey guys, there’s no need to panic! I’m using metaphor’ – but instead seems to deliberately stir them up even further!
“Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them.” (John 6:53-56)

Of course if you’re a good Catholic you may be thinking to yourself by now ‘What is your problem? He’s talking about the Eucharist! Isn’t that obvious?’
Fair call! If you are a good Catholic with a traditional Catholic understanding of the Eucharist – that the bread and wine of the Eucharist literally become the flesh and blood of Jesus when they are consecrated by the priest, then this dialogue makes sense as an exhortation to participate in the sacrament!

Now, in case you’re not familiar with the different understandings that exist between the different Christian denominations when it comes to the Eucharist, the best way of remembering the distinctions, I think, was that given to me by my old mate, Tony Campolo (the great Baptist evangelist) who put it this way:
In the Catholic understanding, the bread mysteriously becomes the body of Jesus and the blood mysteriously becomes His blood
In the Anglican understanding, the bread remains bread and the wine remains wine, but to the person who consumes them in faith they become the body and blood of Jesus.
In the Baptist understanding, he points out, the bread remains bread, and the wine magically becomes grape juice!

At any rate, if you’re a good Catholic, you may well make an immediate association between this dialogue and the Eucharist – a sacrament that had its origin, you’ll remember, in the ‘Last Supper’ between Jesus and His disciples.   
The problem with making that link here though, in the sixth chapter of John’s Gospel, is that the Last Supper hasn’t happened by this stage. Moreover, while the Last Supper, where Jesus breaks the bread and shares the wine, saying ‘This is my body/This is my blood’, is recorded in each of the first three Gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) it isn’t actually recorded in John’s Gospel at all, which is why even good Catholic scholars are reluctant to see these words in John 6 as a reference to an event that John failed to record!

If Jesus wasn’t referring to the Eucharist, was He really just trying to confuse us? I believe that there is a third possibility – namely, that Jesus was trying to make a point, and one that had to be made using really stark and offensive language because it’s a point that is not easy to hear.

In truth, communicating with people is not easy. That was my starting point today – that good communication requires clarity, but sometimes clarity is not enough when it comes to good communication!

I was speaking to a school teacher during the week who was keen to get me to come and speak to her children as she said “they are so used to listening to me they never really hear what I have to say!” I said “I hear you, sister! We preachers have exactly the same problem!”

Sometimes it’s not what you’re saying but who is saying it that’s the problem! And sometimes it’s not what you’re saying or who’s saying it but rather the filters we have as hearers that transform whatever is being said into something we can more comfortably hear.

A good friend of mine worked for many years as a missionary in some very poor parts of Africa and he had a very strong understanding of Jesus’ teachings about the dangers of material wealth and our obligations as followers of Jesus to share what we have with the poor. When he came back to Australia the church put this man in a very wealthy parish and I wondered how he would go.

I asked him “how do your people respond when you talk to them about Jesuscondemnation of the rich? Are they offended” He said “No. I find wherever I go that when people hear Jesus talk about ‘the rich’ they always assume He is referring to people in the wealth bracket just above theirs” (just as we do)!
Sometimes our filters and our prejudices are such that it is almost impossible to hear what people say no matter how clearly they say it, and this is why sometime humor or poetry or song can communicate much more potently than any confrontational statement, and sometimes, conversely, it is a confrontational statement that is needed in order to achieve penetration!
I am the living bread that came down from heaven” says Jesus. Whoever eats this bread will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” (John 6:51)
Jesus is trying to make a point, and it is a counter-intuitive point, and it’s a point that is not easy for us to hear as it confronts all our religious prejudices, and that point surely is that what we really need from Jesus is Jesus!
If that doesn’t make immediate sense try looking at things from the perspective of the crowd who first heard this. What were they doing there?
From the greater dialogue in this section of John’s Gospel it’s evident that a lot of the people who were there were just looking for a free feed!
Others may have been looking to be entertained by Jesus.
No doubt some of them were looking for wisdom and direction in life.
No doubt many were there hoping to be healed of their illnesses.
Quite likely most of them were there because their friends were there and they had nothing better to do.
Whatever the crowds were doing there it’s pretty clear that neither they nor the disciples really understood that the most important thing Jesus had to offer them was His body!
Jesus had lots of good ideas but it wasn’t His ideas that they most needed!
Jesus had no shortage of wisdom but it wasn’t Jesus’ wisdom that they most needed.
Jesus had the power to heal them of disease as He had the power to feed them, but it wasn’t his power to heal or to feed (in the ordinary sense of the words) that they most needed.

What they most needed from Jesus and what we most need from Jesus is Jesus – in His body: the flesh of Jesus melded with our flesh, the body of Jesus as a part of our body, the life of Jesus living within us – and if that sounds offensive and all too fleshly then it’s time to be offended for, as this passage makes very clear, Christianity is a religion of the flesh!

This, as I say, confronts our religious intuitions. We look to religion to get wisdom, direction, comfort. What Jesus tells us is that what we need most is not more knowledge. We need to be transformed in our bodies! We need His flesh to become a part of our flesh! He need His blood flowing through our veins just as we need to be breathing His breath and seeing through His eyes. We need to be living the life of Jesus. We need God with us in our bodies!

This indeed is the heart of the Christian Gospel, as I understand it – that God comes to us in Jesus, not simply to pass on good advice, nor to hand down to us any new set of laws, but simply to be with us in body, and to make contact with us in our bodies, and to become involved with us and to suffer and die with us (and for us) and to be present with us in our bodies, always!

Father’s Day is coming up, and I know that in some Primary Schools they still have special Father’s Day events that (sadly) few fathers ever manage to attend. Even so, I heard of one such day where kids in the class were taking turns standing up and telling their classmates about their fathers.
My dad is a gynecologist one boy proudly announced, and then went on in some detail to explain to the rest of the class all the wonderful things his dad was capable of doing (much to the amazement of his peers and the horror of his teacher). A young girl then stood up and announced that her dad was a lawyer, and she likewise spoke in glowing terms of her dads work.
As the next little girl got up the teacher winced a little as she knew her dad was unemployed at the moment and she was concerned that this girl wouldn’t know what to say but, on the contrary, this little one jumped up beaming and announced proudly to everyone “my dad … is here!

Presence – real, tangible, physical presence! It’s what we need most from those who love us, and it’s what we need most from God as well. Yes, we need rules and we need wisdom and we need healing and we need a lot of things, but most of all we just need Him! We need God, and we need God in Jesus – living with us and through us, His body in our bodies.
For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me and I live because of the Father, so the one who feeds on me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven … whoever feeds on this bread will live forever.” (John 6:55-58)



Sunday, 15 June 2014

1st Sunday After Pentecost - Trinity Sunday - Br Andrew

                            
Andre-Rublev's Saviour


Homily preached at Winmalee by Br Andrewvon  Sunday 15th June 2014:
Trinity Sunday. Year A.








Many Persons in Ones God



Gospel Matthew 28:16-20


Today is Trinity Sunday and, in the words of Jesus in today’s gospel we find the Trinity inferred for the first time after Pentecost.  (Matt.28:19) Considering that we are Monotheists believing God is One then who are these three?
We know of the Father since He is our Creator, we know that Jesus is the one referred to as the “Son” and as for the Holy Spirit, he or she has been here since the world was created:-The Ruach Elohim, Breath of God; who first brooded over the waters (Gen. 1:2), the Ruach Hakkodesh the Holy Breath of God (Ps.51:11) to whom David prayed  “do not take your Holy Spirit from me” Yet how is it that these three are One?

In Exodus 34: 5 the One refers to its self as “Yahweh” so we do know that the One has a name. In ancient times to know someone’s name was to know the source of their secret strengths or life, to reveal your name to another was a huge step towards being in relationship with that person. The first time Moses met with Yahweh was at the burning bush,(Ex.3:14) at the beginning of his ministry where we learnt from the Scriptures that “Yahweh is translated I Am that I Am” – Yahweh, Y’hw’h without its now unknown vowels leaving the  Hebrew consonant’s which when spoken together Yoh- hey, vah, hey—almost sounds like we are  breathing. The Name is the very breath we take to sustain life. I Am forever fully present I AM the One who makes all others things be.

This Yoh-hey,vah,hey  is the Ruach Hakkodesh because the Jews have always believed that they are the same. Yet the Ruach hakkodesh is also uniquely itself with its own areas of operation.
“From the time of creation constant reference is made in Holy Writ to Messiah and the Messianic hope of Israel. ‘The Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters”; the spirit of God means Messiah.”
(Midrash Genesis Rabbah 2; Leviticus Rabbah 14)
Definition:
In Judaism, the Midrash (Hebrew: מדרש‎; plural midrashim) is the body of homiletic stories told by Jewish rabbinic sages to explain passages in the Tanakh. Midrash is a method of interpreting biblical stories that goes beyond simple distillation of religious, legal, or moral teachings. It fills in gaps left in the biblical narrative regarding events and personalities that are only hinted at.purose of midrash was to resolve problems in the interpretation of difficult passages of the text of the Hebrew Bible, using Rabbinic principles of hermeneutics and philology to align them with the religious and ethical values of religious teachers.
As time passes Yahweh reveals only enough about the One who Is as we can understand and have the wisdom and courage to believe.
The Jews of old knew Yahweh as a Father (Ex.4:22), a Shepherd (Psalm 22/23:1), a Husband, (Is.54:5-8), Potter (Jer.18:6), and Vineyard owner, (Ps.80:8-13) they did not as yet know him as a brother; nor would they believe, in a hurry that their Father, through mystic means would beget a human son.

Yahweh in choosing to enter into a relationship with us became vulnerable because the One, with His Spirit entered into Covenant with us to keep us safe and in His anthropomorphic form as his own son knew he would be required to enter creation to suffer and to die to save it from sin and death.

And so it is that another comes to us from Yahweh, One who has always existed, whom we yet do not know: He comes into our world as one of us, a defenceless child, he is the Messiah prophesied in the previous Covenant.
”For to us a child is born. To us a son is given; and the government will be on his shoulders. His name will be called Wonderful, Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.(Is. 9:6 WEB )
 His conception is miraculous, his birth unremarkable, he grows up in Nazareth in a province known as Galilee of the Gentiles.

While Jesus the Christ was with us he taught us more about Yahweh than was ever yet revealed because He is Yahweh, standing in the flesh beside the people of his time and yet seated in heaven taking care of the world. (John 3:13)

Before Jesus ascended into heaven he said to his Apostles ‘All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.  Go, therefore, make disciples of all nations; baptise them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teach them to observe all the commands I gave you. And look, I am with you always; yes, to the end of time.' (Matt 28: 17b-20 NJB)

Jesus also promised that his Father would send another Comforter, the Spirit of Truth and this is the one we have already met, this Spirit, is the Ruach-Hakkodesh of old, given to the 72 Elders to Prophets and Kings, sometimes not permanently, as in the case of King Saul, who went mad when the spirit left him.

The Holy Spirit is not just given selectively to the chosen but on the day of Pentecost roughly 33 AD was sent, into the world  as a Person, in his or her own right – just as the prophet Joel prophesied “ In the last days -- the Lord declares -- I shall pour out my Spirit on all humanity. Your sons and daughters shall prophesy, your young people shall see visions, your old people dream dreams.” (Acts 2:16,17:cf Joel 3 NJB)
We live because we breathe the Spirit of Yahweh
When the Holy Spirit comes upon us it melds with our own Spirit to testify that we are now sons and daughters of Yahweh, inheritors of all good things, brothers and sisters of Christ, one with Yahweh.

 Now, with two out of three of the members of the One having been manifest in the world, and Jesus the Word made flesh having ascended back to heaven as a human being the Church gradually began asking how does the puzzle actually work. How are these three One? Since Jesus was once human how is he divine? Is he a different Person/part of God than he was when he was the Word?

We are spatial, linear beings and so Yahweh’s wonderful gift of his only selves causes us to get out our metaphorical screwdrivers to try to take God apart, rather than to simply say aha, how wonderful.

From Jewish Midrash we learned that Yahweh and his Spirit are the same,from the earlier Covenant we know that Yahweh was called Father by the Israelites therefore from Jesus, who says that he and the Father are One we know that Jesus and Yahweh are the same.
Therefore we know that God is Yahweh,Yeshuah, and Ruach Hakkodesh, (Father, Jesus and Holy Spirit) that each are fully Yahweh ( God) and at the same time uniquely themselves. Sometimes we relate to a Father or to Jesus or to the Spirit. Sometimes to all three as One
Let us close with the part of the prayer Jesus prayed for all believers

20 My prayer is not for them alone. I pray also for those who will believe in me through their message, 

2 1 that all of them may be one, Father, just as you are in me and I am in you. May they also be in us so that the world may believe that you have sent me. 
22 I have given them the glory that you gave me, that they may be one as we are one— 
23 I in them and you in me—so that they may be brought to complete unity. Then the world will know that you sent me and have loved them even as you have loved me. (John 17:20-23 NIV)


There are as many Persons of God as there are his Children, all one with God all uniquely ourselves. 

Br Andrew

Wednesday, 21 May 2014

5th Sunday of Easter - Br Luke

 
Andre-Rublev's Saviour 



Homily preached at Winmalee on Sunday 18th May  2014




Gospel John 14:1-14




In the Christian faith, we believe that Jesus, was, is both human and divine.  That he was, is, the second person of the trinity.  An integral member of the Godhead.  As it says in the creed, of the same substance as the Father.  But did Jesus know this? Did he tell us this, or is this simply the theological construct of the early church fathers and mothers? Something which was written to distinguish the faith from Judaism?  Can we see proof?  The answer is really quite simple.

Indeed if we ever want some indication from the scriptures that Christ knew who he was, here it is. “Philip. He who has seen me has seen the Father.” And “I am in the Father, and the Father in me?”  This of course to the Jews was blasphemy, and it was this above all that caused them to want him dead.  But to us it’s not blasphemy – its proof.

But what does it mean.  After all Stephen as we heard in the reading from Acts was so convinced of the truth of this that he died for this belief.  As did countless martyrs through the centuries, especially during the horrible Roman persecutions.

It means quite simply that Jesus was, is, God.  He was always aware of the thoughts and actions of the other members of the trinity.  Now I know this sounds like I’m about to embark on a dissertation on the Trinity – I’m not.  I’m going to leave that for another day. Instead I do want to focus our attention today on the passage that’ seems to me, to indicate that Jesus was so aware of who he was, that he gently castigated Philip about it.

The question is of course, do we believe it.  If I was to be honest I would have to say, given the number of people who no longer come to church, who seem to want to flee from, or deny the faith – the answer is no.  This is not only sad, it’s tragic.  The human race cannot survive without faith.  And in our desire to have some sort of faith, people today have replaced “the way the truth and the life” with other beliefs.  Some of which are not really faiths but distractions. Put bluntly, they are simply replacements for God.  How terribly, terribly empty and bereft that is.

But Jesus give us an out, an escape clause for those who find it just too difficult to believe in his divinity. “Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me; or else believe me for the very works’ sake.”  So if the words can’t convince you, look at the deeds.  Looks at the miracles and believe then.
This should be easy, then, for us who live in what is generally called the post-modern era.  We just won’t believe anything unless it can be proved.  So the miracles Jesus did, should be proof enough to keep us happy.  But no, these are now questioned.  Interpreted as myths, exaggerations, allegories, or people try to find a medical explanation for the healing.  They will grasp at anything that will allow them to deny, yes deny, Jesus’s divine nature, and thus deny God.

After all, if the record is faulty, then we need not believe. And therefore the faith is meaningless and it is devoid of anything that would make it genuine.  And then the logic goes, we can abandon it, treat it as outdated, out of touch with reality and irrelevant. Make no mistake when we do this, then we allow the evil one to enter and rule.  And that is not something that we can, or should, treat lightly.

In spite of what the modern world may think, evil is not to be glorified, it is to be opposed. For evil destroys - it does not create.  Evil leads us to dark places where deeds are done in secret, where light is shunned and spurned.  These are all places where people can hide and not be honest or responsible to themselves, or to others.  In these dark places, people do not love each other, they feed on each other, they destroy each other; they cause death.  And we only have to look around us and will all too easily see the deathly fruits of evil.

So what are we to do in the face of evil?  We are to ask God to help us, to guide us, to protect us.  Jesus said: “Whatever you will ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If you will ask anything in my name, I will do it.”

We of course are often too afraid to ask.  Don’t be.  It is when we seek that we find, when we knock that we are admitted and when we ask, that we receive.  So have courage, ask for help in overcoming evil, in dispelling the darkness, in consigning evil to the empty void where it belongs.



Thursday, 12 December 2013

Homily, 2nd Advent by Br Luke EFO.

St- Andre-Rublev's Saviour
Holy Redeemer

In the care of the Ecumenical Franciscan Order

Homily, 8th December 2013, 2nd Sunday in Advent, delivered by Br Luke EFO.



There are times, aren’t there, when what we read in the Scriptures just seems to shout at us? They just seem to confirm that the task we have before us is the right one. Today I think is one of these times. The Gospel reading today is about John baptising people. He is giving them a new start in the faith journey.
For us Christian’s baptism, is the start of our faith journey as followers of Christ. For Pentecostals, it is the full immersion in the water of baptism that signifies their being “born again”; and is the necessary precursor for them to receive the Holy Spirit. For the traditionalists, baptism in the name of the Holy Trinity is enough. But in either, or both scenarios the act of baptism is an act of faith and results from, and leads to, commitment. And it is from that act of faith that a journey starts. So today we are staring something new. We have stepped out in faith, much like a baptism and we are starting to walk a path we believe Christ set before us. And like the faith journey that stars with baptism, so too must this new beginning today be a start not an end.
John warns those coming to be baptised that the simple act of baptism is/was not enough. The act must be followed by commitment. If we are simply baptised and then do nothing to walk as a Christian, then we may as well not have been baptised in the first place. Jesus tells us there are two great commandments: The first, is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your mind, with all your strength and with all your soul”. That is hard enough, but then he adds the second. “Love your neighbour and yourself”. For some of us it is hard enough to love ourselves let alone the persons next door, or the person we know to be our neighbour. Yet this is exactly what Jesus asks of us. That act of love, starts with our faith journey and doesn’t stop.
Now, you know, I have no doubt that the next time we read this passage of scripture the Holy Spirit will focus us on a different part of the passage. Or perhaps give us a different perspective on the same words we have just heard. For some of us this may be uncomfortable, but I think this should not alarm nor surprise us. This is the nature and purpose of the Scriptures. They are there to inspire, guide, encourage and challenge, confront and shock us and that won’t happen if every time we read them, we have the same response.
So while we start something new today, it is not enough for us just to be here today. We need to ensure we walk the path we have been shown and so we need to be here each week. To show both the commitment and the love that Jesus asks and calls us to. It won’t be easy, but then nothing of real worth ever is.